Saturday, July 21, 2012
Why Organic Certification is not necessarily the answer to ensure good quality food.
Organic certification implies that food grown under this label is grown without the use of chemical fertilizers and agricultural poisons but it doesn't automatically allow you to assume that it is necessarily nutrient-rich or of high quality.
The organic industry is based on building up the soil by increasing humus levels and nutrient levels. The nutrients we are talking about aren't just the major ones like phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen, but the much larger range of nutrients such as selenium, boron, molybdenum and silicon. There are more than 70 trace elements that are essential for good plant health and these need to be added to the soil regularly and monitored as well.
When applying for certification, organic growers need to do a soil test but no one checks whether, once certification is given, nutrient deficiencies in the soil are rectified or if there is regular input of nutrients to replace those that are taken up by the vegetables and trees that are grown in the soil.
There is no on-going monitoring of the mineral levels, vitamins and amino acids in organic food in spite of the fact that these are really important in maintaining human health.
We have never applied for organic certification because we have always been aware of the deficiencies in the organic certification process. We know our food is of extremely high standard because we monitor soil nutrient levels by doing soil tests regularly. Our soil organic levels are over 14% which is quite exceptional. Because our buyers respect the quality of the food we produce, know that it is freshly picked and full of nutrients when they buy it, we sell everything we grow on our Community Farm. Our only problem is that we can't grow enough to meet demand.
Written by Bev Buckley
For more information goto http://www.growinghealthyorganicfood.com/course1
Labels:
boron,
community farm,
nitrogen,
organic certification,
organic food,
selenium,
silicon,
vegetables
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I bought a gelder rose and planted it on my boundary last year, it is meant to be the one that has berries but in its first year in the ground it only flowered, no berries. Am thinking it was wrongly labelled and is the sterile one, does anyone know if they sometimes take a while before producing berries? It was very dry this year too, I wonder if that could have had an effect. Thanks.Ahmedabad Flowers
ReplyDelete